The paper “Integrating Robotic Fabrication in
the Design Process” details the research done by a master’s studio on the use
of robotic fabrication to inform the design process. The groups of students
each created models of high rise buildings for proposed sites in Singapore. The
models were created at 1:50 scale with the use of many tools and materials on
the robots. This large scale offered a unique way of working through the design
process, since problems of construction that would not be evident at a smaller
scale presented themselves in the ten-foot towers. The use of robots to build
the model required students to consider spatial relationships between the
parts, as well as the order in which the pieces could be assembled. For this
reason, and because each material required different assembly techniques, the
author argues that the programming of the robot was a design process in itself.
The description of this project
poses the question of what role the robotic fabrication process can occupy in
architectural design. For these students, it was a means to work at large
scales with precision, and to do it with a variety of materials, unlike a 3D print. Speed, however, was not a factor, since the programming time for new
buildings must have taken considerable time.
In our class, defining “appropriate
tasks” to use robots for is an important consideration, since the time it takes
to set up and run an error-free program is often longer than the time taken to
do it by hand. So far our primary factor has been precision, since this is one
thing that the robots can certainly do better than humans. This article makes
the argument that robots can allow for more complex designs while still
allowing them to be modeled. It also states that students worked to design a
set of processes, instead of a form. They used the movements and abilities of
the robots to inform their design process, rather than simply employing the
robots once the design has been made. I think that this argument for
considering fabrication in form development is a strong one. Because robots don’t
always expedite the creation of the model, it’s hard to argue for their use as
a simply practical tool when building prototype models. Instead, robots should
be considered for their specific characteristics of precision and being able to
locate points in space without reference points. These
capabilities allow for more varied designs, as these students found with their
high rise structures. Instead of simply using the robots to quickly make their
end product, they used the robots to aid in their designs from the early stages.
No comments:
Post a Comment