Final Project: Skyscraper Facade

Project 009: RoboPinch

Assignment 8 - Catenaries

Base Curve was chosen then grasshopper script was written to pick up the midpoint by dividing point then call CullNth to pick up the midpoint

Orientation point is made to be on the curve perpendicular to the base curve.

Wax melted in Crock Pot

Pinning and Gluing 

Reading 005_Lena Pfeiffer_Authoring Robotic Processes

This article Authoring Robotic Processes, by Gramazio and Kholer, discusses the shift from digitally designed architecture to digitally constructed architecture.  It is no longer a relationship between "dematerialization and pure form" but of the construction of those forms from the digital realm into the 3D.  With the introduction of digital fabrication, there are fewer limitations on the possibilities for construction.  Through computational logic and material realization robots will be able to shift the parameters of design and fabrication. But it is important to use our design to inform the work of the robot and not the other way around, or else we will not be expanding our view of design. The robots must be approached as a tool for furthering design, not a limitation.  One of the main advantages of the robot that gives it an advantage over many digital fabrication devices is its manual dexterity.  This is the ability to be multi-functional because it is, in some form, "generic".  This allows for endless tools to be used on the robot, such as the ones we used and constructed in class.  This allows for options of building, placing, filming, painting, and so on, which in turn gives us very well rounded understanding of material and structure.
Scale is another factor that plays into the use of the robot.  The robot arm can be placed on track and given a wider range of motion, but that can only take its motions so far.  One project Granazio and Kholer discuss is their fly quadrocopters.  The next step is to figure out how to apply this to full scale construction.

Monica Reading Response 007: Retooling for Mass Markets

                Tom Verebes, an Associate Professor at the University of Hong Kong, speculates about the use of robots in construction in his article, “Retooling for Mass Markets in the 21^st Century”. The title of his piece responds to a quote by Thomas Kuhn, which states that retooling in manufacture is an extravagance only necessary when a crisis demands it. Verebes argues that this crisis is found today in China, where 10 million new urban inhabitants require housing each year.

                Because of the urgent need for housing in China in what the author calls “The Asian Century”, standardized building types are created for efficiency’s sake. The approach to building threatens to turn Chinese cities into homogeneous environments reminiscent of Modernist planning ideals. Robotic fabrication is a possible solution for creating customized and unique cities, rather than systematic, mass-produced ones.

                Research in robotic fabrication has been happening in elite architecture schools for some time now, and these techniques have recently been adopted by some entrepreneurs. However, although the technology is available and can be applied at different scales, there are still many hurdles to overcome before robots are used in the typical construction process. From a standpoint that considers only time and money, it is impractical to change the current construction tools and move robotic fabrication into the construction site. Instead of this, robots should be used in conjunction with existing building technologies, not just to save time and create efficient buildings, but also to create unique, beautiful, and non-standardized cities for the world’s growing urban population.

Reading 007: Retooling for Mass Markets: Hillary Davlin's Response

"Retooling for Mass Markets", written by Tom Verebes, poses a counterpoint for the implementation of robotics in the 21^st century, or as he terms it, the “Asian-Century”.  Today, robots have slowly been integrated into architectural design, practice, discourse, teaching and researching, but have hardly been considered in the physical building or a contemporary city. Verebes argues that robotics poses great opportunity to aid in the population demands across East Asian today. While robots may reduce both time and money through the production of high-rise residential buildings, there is a concern that robots may not be used to their full potential in order to create variation rather than similar architectural typologies.  Robots have been associated in the 20^th century with a monotonous, Fordism ideology, where repetitive products are produced in a timely manner.  Although robots today have the same standardization ability, there is opportunity for diversity through different tooling and robotic applications.

Customizing different robotic tools has the ability to transform a city, allowing for a vast differentiation of architectural high-rise typologies, while still doing so in an efficient time.  The question at this point becomes not how robots can change urban skylines, but if they will be used to do so.  In the article, Verebe reiterates Kittler’s stance on new technological media, stating that, “new media does not make old media obsolete; they assign them other places in the system” (p. 129). Robots, in this case, will most likely be combined with old building techniques in order to address housing issues of the 21^st century. The responsibility thus relies on architects, developers, and city officials, if the potential of robotic retooling will create a unique and successful city skyline, or a dreary, monotonous urban fabric for the future population to live within.

Assignment 8 Take 1

Our two methods of holding the felt to the gripper

Adding the wax...